Voluntary redundancy – could an employee still claim unfair dismissal?
Although voluntary redundancy is often regarded as lower risk than compulsory redundancy, there are still traps for the unwary employer.
Although voluntary redundancy is often regarded as lower risk than compulsory redundancy, there are still traps for the unwary employer.
A recent decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) could be regarded as an early Christmas present by beleaguered HR professionals.
In times when many businesses are sadly having to consider downsizing, the obligation to consult employees about proposed redundancies can sometimes be counter-intuitive.
Although the right to make a request for flexible working has been available to parents of young children since 2003, many sectors have remained resistant to the idea of enabling staff to depart from traditional working patterns.
Colleges and schools can face a huge dilemma when grappling with cases of teachers being suspected of possession of indecent images of children.
Mention the words “service provision change” and the spectre of TUPE hovers in front of you.
As most employers are aware, there are many instances when the organisation may be liable for the wrongful actions of their staff.
With so many businesses regrettably looking to make reductions in their workforce as a result of the pandemic, a recently reported case provides a timely reminder of the key principles to follow in a redundancy situation.
Workers who are accused of criminal offences are, like everyone else, innocent until proven guilty – but what if keeping them on threatens to cause reputational damage to their employer?